Summary: | superfluous dependency on libpam? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Sisyphus | Reporter: | Ivan Zakharyaschev <imz> |
Component: | pine | Assignee: | viy <viy> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | qa-sisyphus |
Severity: | minor | ||
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | unstable | ||
Hardware: | all | ||
OS: | Linux |
Description
Ivan Zakharyaschev
2009-11-08 23:18:49 MSK
I've looked at Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu, openSuse: their alpine packages have the same imperfection (they depend on libpam), but PLD seems to have correctly patched the build process os that their alpine doesn't depend on libpam: http://www.rpmseek.com/rpm/alpine-2.00.25-1.athlon.html?hl=de&cs=alpine:PN:0:27:0:0:0:7281438 -- Benötigt * aspell * ca-certificates * config * libc.so.6 * libcom_err.so.2 * libcrypt.so.1 * libcrypto.so.0.9.8 * libdl.so.2 * libgssapi_krb5.so.2 * libhome_etc.so.1 * libkrb5.so.3 * liblber-2.4.so.2 * libldap-2.4.so.2 * libpthread.so.0 * libresolv.so.2 * libsasl2.so.2 * libssl.so.0.9.8 * libtinfo.so.5 * rtld * rpmlib http://www.rpmseek.com/rpm/alpine-1.00.12-2.i686.html?hl=de&cs=alpine:PN:0:0:0:0:0:6428106 -- Benötigt * /bin/sh * aspell * config * libc.so.6 * libcrypt.so.1 * libcrypto.so.0.9.8 * libdl.so.2 * libhome_etc.so.1 * liblber-2.4.so.2 * libldap-2.4.so.2 * libpthread.so.0 * libresolv.so.2 * libsasl2.so.2 * libssl.so.0.9.8 * libtinfo.so.5 * rtld * rpmlib (In reply to comment #1) > same imperfection (they depend on libpam), but PLD seems to have correctly > patched the build process os that their alpine doesn't depend on libpam: As one can see from their spec-file, they used the solution described here as well -- http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=90746#post90746 : "Regarding the PAM issue, I agree with the suggestion to build using slx or lnx as the c-client target. lnx may be a better choice than slx; <...> Alternatively, you could just supply dummy PAM modules if you don't want to override the configure script. It only matters for the POP3 and IMAP servers;" |